Recently, a painting by S Bishwa arrived from the
framer. It
is titled “Sunyata,” the emptiness that can only be achieved when one is
free from attachments. The pictured novice monks are attending “Tshechu” a
religious ceremony to help them achieve freedom from attachment.
Bhutan is a beautiful country with noble goals. Day to day it is no more noble than any other country. Because it is small, new, and allows open debate it offers an opportunity to explore social issues and the explorer has a unique opportunity to reflect on how problems occur and their solutions.
Here is a letter on the case from Durga Gurung:
Update: In August 2013 Dechen was released from prison. She is now an open air prisoner, Open air prisoners live a compound. Dechen describes it as a community of female inmates where they farm and weave.
The same day we received souvenirs (purses, bags, and a
cap) from Dechen Wangmo. Her story illustrates the state of Bhutan’s democracy, human rights, and justice. In 2009 she was convicted of treason. Since March her appeal was under consideration. On 10 October Bhutan's Supreme Court upheld her 15 year sentence. We were disheartened at the news. I am sure her family was devastated. In this posting I share my thoughts about Bhutan and the charges of treason. At the end I include a long message from an Indian acquaintance of Dechen. Dechen's brother also sent me a copy of the South Asian Human Rights Index 2008, which was critical of Bhutan's human rights record. If you have any comments that will help her family let me know, and I will pass the information on.
We are often asked if the Bhutanese are really happy. The
question is motivated by Bhutan’s objective of achieving Gross National
Happiness (GNH). Holding a citizen for treason may seem inconsistent with GNH.
Balanced against GNH are Bhutan’s concerns with issues such as corruption, human rights violations,
and judicial independence. The issues are no different from those faced by all countries, including those that focus on Gross
National Product. In simplistic terms GNH calls on the country’s leadership to
seek and adopt policies that increase the well-being of Bhutanese. We were reminded of Singapore that fines litterers, provided economic incentives to limit the number of births and now
policies to promote more births, and outlawed chewing gum.
Bhutan’s democracy can be viewed as a component of GNH. Achieving democracy is a gradual process –Bhutan’s first Constitution was drafted in 2007, the ban against political parties was lifted in 2007, and the first national election was held in 2008. (Here is a link to a discussion of the development of GNH and democracy in Bhutan.) First lesson in respect to Dechen – a national goal of GNH does not translate into happiness for an individual citizen or guarantee that she will find government officials responsive to her concerns.
Bhutan’s democracy can be viewed as a component of GNH. Achieving democracy is a gradual process –Bhutan’s first Constitution was drafted in 2007, the ban against political parties was lifted in 2007, and the first national election was held in 2008. (Here is a link to a discussion of the development of GNH and democracy in Bhutan.) First lesson in respect to Dechen – a national goal of GNH does not translate into happiness for an individual citizen or guarantee that she will find government officials responsive to her concerns.
In Malaysia police reports are made when someone (normally a political figure) makes a comment that is considered “insensitive.” Demands that
the person be charged with sedition may follow. Treason is a serious charge, but it may be based on acts that other governments would shrug off and ignore. The
second lesson is that a government, especially in a young democracy, may be
reluctant to change a course of action. Treason is a political
charge and it may not be backed by consistent, reliable criteria.
Dechen cannot rely on an international response to a possible human rights violation. Getting two possible international organizations to focus on any case is not easy: Amnesty International gets many requests and International Justice Mission, avocates for person subjected to slavery, torture, and sexual exploitation. Her case was brought to the attention
of the United Nations Human Rights Commission. Bhutan’s response was the she
could have gotten life imprisonment instead of the 15 year sentence. The next
Universal Periodic Review (UPR) for Bhutan is scheduled for 2013. In Malaysia
NGOs work together as COMANGO to monitor human rights and organize the
stakeholders’ point of view for Malaysia’s UPR. No similar NGO mechanism exists
in Bhutan. Bhutan has few NGOs and the ones that exist focus on development
activities. Based on Malaysia’s experience, despite monitoring and active
engagement NGOs' Human Rights voice may go unheard .Third lesson –NGOs that
address human rights abuses have high demand limiting the number of persons
they can help; UN Human Rights mechanisms don’t guaranteed access to
stakeholders or responses by offending country.
Bhutan is a beautiful country with noble goals. Day to day it is no more noble than any other country. Because it is small, new, and allows open debate it offers an opportunity to explore social issues and the explorer has a unique opportunity to reflect on how problems occur and their solutions.
Here is a letter on the case from Durga Gurung:
First
of all, honestly, we are inspired by the thought, addressed by your 5th
King on the National day 2010. Quote “There is a higher responsibility not
written in any legal document but instead enshrined in humanity” National
responsibility means upholding values such as integrity justice and compassion.
A strong civil society is a fundamental pillars of democracy” . unquote.
As
such, we the members of civil society from your closest and oldest friend,
India, would like to share our views and sympathy toward the imprisonment of a
social worker for the last 3 years. We are feeling sorry and would like to
provide her some moral support on humanitarian ground.
In
a remarkable twist of fate, Dechen Wangmo is incarcerated behind the bars. She
has been slapped with treason charge. As far as we know, she was a gentle,
modest woman, who has put up with great pain and humiliation and came through a
terrible ordeal with her dignity and honor intact. We know her with honesty and
integrity that are the hallmarks of her contributions as a social worker and
her love for the country. She has no relation of ours, but then she is a
relation of yours as a Bhutanese citizen. She is a relation of a lot of people
as a global citizen.
It’s
not at all clear to start with that the thing she has been exactly accused of
having link with the people of your own people living in Jhapa has been really
proved beyond doubt, although we never sensed her mingle with the refugee.
Secondly, even if this were correct, that doesn’t amount to treason.
Thirdly,
in exercising any kind of judgment, one has to take into account the character
of the person. When treason usually takes the form of inciting people to
violence or actually committing some violence and asking others to follow, one
of which had happened, the whole thing seems a ridiculous use of law of GNH
Country. She hasn’t killed anyone, nor incited anyone to rise in violent
protest or rebellion; instead she was very dedicated social worker besides
being successful entrepreneur, who provided jobs to jobless people. To turn the
dedicated service of someone who drops everything to serve the cause of the
society into a criminal is against the law of the human rights. Sentence of a
social worker in jail is “unjust” and “in
human”. We had been reading and learning that justice system in Bhutan is by
and large fair but it don’t seem to be in reality. You know, that “Justice
delayed is not only justice denied”, but it also corruption enhanced. We are not
suggesting that we overrule the judicial system in any way.
It
is a huge perversion of the system of justice, particularly of the laws
concerning treason. Many great leaders challenged the judiciary to uphold
humanity. The first responsibility and duty of every individual and society is
to bring justice. Justice can only prevail when the barriers to injustice are
eliminated.
Any
government that imprisons people unjustly invites citizens’ wrath. Bureaucrat
should not be shared of taking decisions for fear of incurring the wrath of an investigating
agency. Unfortunately, it will culminate in damaging the lives of innocent
people. A good and faith judge must strive to determine what is right rather
than who is right. The house of parliament is also people’s highest shrine of
freedom in a true democracy. Where justice is denied, the whole system becomes
an organized conspiracy to oppress its citizen. The imprisonment and dismissal
of her bail please have definitely dented her social status. Except her
immediate family members, there is nobody by her side. She has been isolated
and neglected to face the humiliation alone. She has been shunned by her
friends, Association, Authorities and the people with whom she worked to bring
positive impact in the society. No one is sorry and concerned for her. It
seemed like the end of the road once she is thrown behind the bars. Not a soul
from her society has tried to convince that she is innocent to be charged on
treason. It’s a severe blow to her faith in the efficacy of how essential her
service is to the society.
In
our country, although it’s known for more corruption, when an innocent person
is imprisoned or treated unjustly, the rest of the society will protest and
will be prepared to go to prison even. We have equally good and bad people but
the strength of civil society and unity exist. It doesn’t seem to be same here
in Bhutan, the last Sangrila! Not a soul
seems to be bothered. NGOs, Private Sector, youth and women groups should raise
the voice against the injustice, mobilize and represent varied social and political
interest or concern. Should raise voice and need to debate on your TV program “People
Voice” if you want to infuse soul into a soulless people. You need to help her
to heal the wound and grudge against the society for not doing anything to save
her from pain and relentless humiliation.
What
has she done to deserve jail without bail? Is there any evidence to show that
she exercised her moral and social influence to excite others into crime?
Should be given the discretion of bail under section 437 of the Criminal
procedure Code as a woman and a mother, which liberally exercise in Indian
Courts? Her fate will hopefully be decided in tune with the rule of law, where
as in India and in other parts of the world human rights activists’ journalist,
NGOs will come forward to fight for the Justice.
Let’s
all consider ourselves as a global citizen and follow the teachings of M.K
Gandhi as “Occasionally, standing up for a human rights and justice is more
important than maintain peace”. Whenever someone stands for justice, he stands
for humanity”. Will she going to be free again from the incarceration the
charges and hopefully the stigma? Let’s move in the direction of harmony of non
discrimination of social equality –hatred can never be removed by hatred. There
will be nothing more encouraging in prison as learning that the people outside
are supporting the cause for which they are inside. When the core group of
countries, led by the US for the compassion and generosity with which they
continue to resettle the people in the refugee camps, why not you try to solve
the problem as well? You need to work together to maintain peace in the
country. Why always leaving for outsiders’ to help? Why creating more grudge by
imprisoning innocent people? You can never solve the biggest political, social
and security challenge for Bhutan, if you continue to have negative thought and
hate against the people living in the Camps? YES, we need drastic changes
before even saying we are a GNH Country. GNH, a vision to aspire with practice
but not for a “Showcase”.
“Guilty
or innocent, you need to reinvent yourself with courage”. Be strong and have
faith…
We
will pray for you…Durga Gurung
Update: In August 2013 Dechen was released from prison. She is now an open air prisoner, Open air prisoners live a compound. Dechen describes it as a community of female inmates where they farm and weave.
No comments:
Post a Comment